By: Cynthia Kurtz
Posted 7/16/2013
We
have a great legal system. We probably use it too often to settle disagreements
that could be resolved by getting everyone in the same room at the same time. But
sometimes it is necessary to hand a matter to the lawyers. It is nice to know
that our legal system is there in case you ever do need to use it.
By and
large, I think the courts find reasonable ways to handle the business and
employment grievances put before them. However, once in a while you hear of a
case and wonder how can that be fair?
The
case in point is a recent judgment against a company in the San Gabriel Valley.
What started as a dispute over a single termination might end up impacting 300
employees and their families. The company is Valley Vista Services, a family
owned solid waste and recycling company that has served the San Gabriel Valley
since 1957.
This
case began when one of Valley Vista’s female employee became ill and wasn’t
able to work. After using sick leave and vacation time, she still wasn’t back
at work. Valley Vista tried to contact her but
she didn’t respond and so the company terminated her for job abandonment.
Her
lawyer says Valley Vista’s action was a wrongful termination and that the
company didn’t try hard enough to accommodate her special needs - panic
attacks.
I
didn’t hear the trial and I don’t know all the details so I make no judgment on
whether the employee was treated fairly or unfairly. The court’s determination
was that she deserved monetary compensation. So let’s accept that and say that
Valley Vista Services should pay the employee damages.
First,
she was awarded $5.2 million in compensatory damages. These are intended to
make her whole for the loss of her job. She was also awarded punitive damages. Punitive
damages are intended to punish the “wrongdoer.” California
doesn’t have any caps on punitive damage awards in these types of cases. Twenty-two
of the 45 states that allow punitive damages set limits.
California does allow the court to look at the company’s value
before setting the damages. In this case the plaintiff’s attorney argued that
the company’s value should not be based on revenues but on the value of the
company if everything was liquidated.
Yes, I
said liquidated. Everything sold, piece by piece, no more company. The court
accepted this argument and Valley Vista Services was hit with an additional
$16.5 million judgment. The $21.7 million penalty is the largest employment
related award of its kind in Los
Angeles County
history. Unless it is overturned on appeal, it will put Valley Vista Services
out of business and put 300 employees out of work.
We’ll
see if an appeal of the case changes the outcome. But if it doesn’t, taking
away the jobs of 300 people who were not the “wrong doers” as a way of righting
the wrong to one employee just doesn’t make sense to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment